On the failure of constitutional engineering in Burundi

Burundi’s post-conflict constitution provides a robust array of formal checks to personal rule. Article 164 mandates a 60-40 Hutu-Tutsi split in National Assembly and 50-50 split in the Senate in order to ensure that the majority Hutu (85%) do not violate the rights of the minority Tutsi (14%). The Batwa (1%) are also guaranteed representation in Parliament through special nomination. Burundi also has a proportional representation (PR) system with a closed list that requires political parties to nominate no more than two thirds of candidates from the same ethnic group. Article 257 of the constitution reinforces the principle of ethnic balance by mandating a 50-50 split in the military. Furthermore, according to Article 300 any amendment to the constitution requires an 80% super-majority in the National Assembly and two thirds of the Senate (this is why Nkurunziza failed in an attempt to amend the constitution in early 2014).

So how did Nkurunziza manage to overcome all these formal institutional checks on his power and engineer a technical third term in office? For answers see here.

Hint: elite consensus on acceptable bounds of political behavior matters a great deal. Looking back, the framers of the Burundian constitution probably should have focused on intra-Hutu balance of power as much as they did on the Hutu-Tutsi balance. Nkurunziza succeeded because not enough Hutu elites (within his own divided party) were willing to punish his blatant contravention of term limits on a questionable technicality. Perhaps they will stand up to him if he tries again in 2020.

1 thought on “On the failure of constitutional engineering in Burundi

  1. The “ethnicity” is the most stupid an dangerous thing in the constitution of Burundi.
    Why stupid? Who can confirm or infirm that somebody is today Hutu or Tutsi? There is only one census, done by 1930? by the Belgian colonization , on the basis of how much cows was in your possession. If you have had less than 10 automatically you have been Hutu and 10 or plus you have been recorded as Tutsi. Read on this Filip Rytjens. So today what kind of distinction should be applied? How much you have on your bank account, or once more you will make accounting of the cows, or you will take the measurement of the length of the nose ?
    Why dangerous? With the so saying quotas the mediocrity and not meritocracy is promoted. So very often the best are left on the road without possibility to get the work, to participate in the politics, etc…… Which brings frustration, cost heavily on the economic, social, … development.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.